Amnesty International Have Called For A Meeting With The Premier League

The £300m sale to the consortium backed by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund last week has transformed the Magpies into one of the world’s richest clubs.

However, the takeover has attracted widespread criticism as a result of the country’s poor human rights record.

Hatice Cengiz, the fiancee of murdered journalist Jamal Khashoggi, described the deal as ‘heartbreaking’ while Amnesty International labelled it “an extremely bitter blow for human rights defenders”.

The Premier League has already faced questions from Newcastle’s furious Premier League rivals, demanding answers on why a prolonged saga was finally able to pass last week.

Now, Amnesty International has written to the league’s chief executive Richard Masters to call for a meeting to address the test which allowed Saudi ownership into English football.

“How can it be right that the Premier League’s current owners’ and director’s test has nothing whatsoever to say about human rights?

“The events of last week will have lent even more urgency to the Government’s ongoing review of the governance of English football.

“Football is a global sport on a global stage it urgently needs to update its ownership rules to prevent those implicated in serious human rights violations from buying into the passion and glamour of English football.

“We hope that Richard Masters will see that making the football’s ownership rules human rights-compliant can only be for the long-term good of the game.”

The Premier League is said to have received “assurances” on the controversial separation issue between the Saudi state and the Public Investment Fund.

Amnesty previously offered to meet Masters alongside corporate lawyer David Chivers QC, who last year co-wrote a new human rights-compliant owners’ and directors’ test on their behalf.

The organisation added: “However, the speedy finalising of the deal last week has lent new impetus to calls on the league to urgently update its ownership rules.

“Amnesty’s analysis shows the current ownership test has numerous serious shortcomings, with no bar on ownership for those complicit in acts of torture, slavery, human trafficking or even war crimes.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.